Industry
places a staggering demand on the nation's water resources. It uses water in
scores of ways-as a solvent, a coolant, a washing agent, an ingredient, a means
of transportation, etc. The amounts of water used sound fantastic. For example,
it takes 200 gallons of water to produce a dollar? Worth of paper; 1400 gallons
to make a dollar's worth of steel. Talking in tons, it takes 320,000 gallons of
water to produce a ton of aluminum; 600,000 gallons for a ton of synthetic
rubber.
We
have been discussing the specialized problems in the United States ; but we should point
out that most of the world's population use water supplies that are unsafe and
insufficient in quantity, dispose of excreta and waste dangerously, and commit
many other sanitary errors. The water pollution hazard is illustrated in a
number of South American countries, where diarrheal diseases remain the leading
cause of death in children from ages 1 to 4. We have an interesting example of
the efforts made in one water-poor South American city of population 350,000, Arequipa , Peru ,
to improve the quantity and quality of the water supply and thus reduce
gastrointestinal disease rates. An intelligent plan to pipe pure water to
houses was set up, but it met resistance expressed in such phrases as 'Water is
a gift from God. Why do we have to pay?" "We prefer river water; it
is sweeter." "How can we wash if water is more expensive?"
How Can We Control Water Pollution?
Unless
the United States takes positive steps to control its increasing water
pollution problem, it may find itself running out of safe, high quality water
for essential needs-personal, agricultural, industrial. The attack on the
water-pollution problem must be threefold: (1) construction of more first-class
water and sewage treatment facilities, an expensive order; (2) enforcement of
laws against practices that create pollution; and (3) development of research
procedures which will find ways to remove the new pollutants and better ways to
get rid of the old contaminants.
The
best of modern sewage treatment plants provide a primary treatment, in which
solids are given a chance to settle out, and a secondary treatment that depends
on bacteriological action. This treatment removes only 75% to 90% of organic
wastes, a smaller fraction of dissolved mineral solids, very little of the
chemically new wastes. The U.S. Public Health Service is therefore encouraging
advanced waste treatment research, through which it is hoped that the
conversion of waste water to fresh water may be genuinely achieved. In 1964 the
Manufacturing Chemists Association undertook a research project to determine
the behavior of organic chemicals in streams, lakes, and rivers. Among the new
techniques for water purification under study, some of which may turn out to
offer practical solutions to the water pollution problem, are absorption by
carbon or other absorptive filter, distillation, foaming, freezing, ion
exchange, solvent extraction, electrodialysis, and even electrolysis.
The
individual can do relatively little, outside of obeying the laws against water
pollution, to reduce this hazard of which he himself may fall victim. He can as
a citizen, however, raise a loud voice to encourage industry, voluntary
agencies, and government agencies at all levels to do their jobs in controlling
water pollution.
One
obvious fact bearing on the United
States water pollution problem is the
condition of its municipal and other sewage facilities. These are not in such
good condition as might have been hoped. In May 1962, the Conference of State
Sanitary Engineers reported that 5290 communities, serving 43 million people,
about one-fourth of the nation's population, required new sewage treatment
plants, plant enlargements, or additional and more effective treatment
facilities. The cost of meeting this need was calculated at about $2.1 billion;
and it was further estimated that needed new sewage works for industry would be
of the same order of cost
No comments:
Post a Comment